Copyright   James R Meyer    2012 - 2023 https://www.jamesrmeyer.com

# On the problem of measuring sets of points on a straight line, by Giuseppe Vitali

This is an English translation of Giuseppe Vitali’s paper of 1905 on the question of the measurability of certain sets by the standard rules of measure, given the axiom of choice/well-ordering: Sul problema della misura dei Gruppi di punti di una retta: Nota, published by Tip. Gamberini e Parmeggiani, 1905.

English translation by James R Meyer, copyright 2022 www.jamesrmeyer.com On the problem of measuring sets of points on a straight line

by Giuseppe Vitali

The problem of measuring sets of points of a straight line r is that of determining for each set A of points of r a real and positive number η(A), which will call the measure of A, so that: (Footnote: See: Leçons sur l’intégration etc, by H. Lebesque p.103, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1904.)

(1) Two sets that can be made to coincide with a convenient rigid displacement of one of them have the same measure.

(2) The sum set of a finite number of sets, or of a denumerable infinity of sets, without points common to any two, has a measure that is the sum of the measures.

(3) The measure of the set of all points of the interval (0, 1) is 1.

Let x be a point of r. The points of r that differ from x by any positive, negative or null rational number form a denumerable set Ax. If Ax1 and Ax2 are two such sets, either they are without any common points or else they coincide.

Consider different Ax sets as elements that constitute a set H. If P is any point of r, there will exist one and only one element of H to which P belongs.

For each element α of H, consider a point Pα of the interval (0, ½) that belongs to α, and we denote by G0 the set of points Pα. If then ρ is any rational number, we will indicate with Gρ the set of points Pα - ρ .

The sets Gρ that correspond to the different rational values ​​of ρ are such that no two have common points, they are also a denumerable infinity and must have the same measure, by (1) above.

The sets

G0, G 1 ⁄2, G 1 ⁄3, G 1 ⁄4, …

all fall within the interval (0, 1), hence their sum must have a measure m ≤ 1.

But it must be the case that

m = μ(G0) +   ∑  n = 2   G 1 ⁄n

= Lim            n → ∞ n · μ(G0)

and therefore

μ(G0 ) = 0

But then the sum of all Gρ corresponding to the different rational values of ρ must also have zero measure. But this sum is the set of all the points of r and therefore it should have infinite measure.

This suffices to conclude that:

the problem of measuring the sets of points of a straight line is insurmountable.

Some objections might be raised with respect to the argument regarding the G0 set. The argument can be considered to be perfectly justifiable if one assumes that the continuum can be well-ordered. If one does not want to make that assumption, the above result means that:

a solution to the problem of measuring sets of points of a straight line is not possible if the continuum is well-ordered.

Footnotes:

### Original Italian text    Interested in supporting this site?

You can help by sharing the site with others. You can also donate at where there are full details.

As site owner I reserve the right to keep my comments sections as I deem appropriate. I do not use that right to unfairly censor valid criticism. My reasons for deleting or editing comments do not include deleting a comment because it disagrees with what is on my website. Reasons for exclusion include:
Comments with excessive number of different points.
Questions about matters that do not relate to the page they post on. Such posts are not comments.
Comments with a substantial amount of mathematical terms not properly formatted will not be published unless a file (such as doc, tex, pdf) is simultaneously emailed to me, and where the mathematical terms are correctly formatted.

Reasons for deleting comments of certain users:
Bulk posting of comments in a short space of time, often on several different pages, and which are not simply part of an ongoing discussion. Multiple anonymous user names for one person.
Users, who, when shown their point is wrong, immediately claim that they just wrote it incorrectly and rewrite it again - still erroneously, or else attack something else on my site - erroneously. After the first few instances, further posts are deleted.
Users who make persistent erroneous attacks in a scatter-gun attempt to try to find some error in what I write on this site. After the first few instances, further posts are deleted.

Difficulties in understanding the site content are usually best addressed by contacting me by e-mail. Based on HashOver Comment System by Jacob Barkdull Copyright   James R Meyer   2012 - 2023
https://www.jamesrmeyer.com