Logic and
Load the menuLoad the menu

Copyright   James R Meyer    2012 - 2024 https://www.jamesrmeyer.com

A Simplified Explanation of Gödel’s Incompleteness Proof:




Page last updated 11 May 2021


This simplified explanation of Gödel’s incompleteness proof (see online at English translation of Gödel’s original proof) has been written in an attempt to make the proof as accessible as possible to as many people as possible, using straightforward English language with a few simple symbols. I have deliberately avoided any need for knowledge on the part of the reader of any complex mathematics. Please note that this simplified explanation is not intended to be a substitute for my detailed explanation of the flaw in Gödel’s proof, which can be found at The Flaw in Gödel’s proof.


The simplified explanation is broken down into ten parts:


Part 1: Basic Logical Concepts

This is a brief survey of variables, what is meant by free and bound variables, and the concept of the substitution of a variable, and the concepts of propositions and functions.


Part 2: Formal Language Systems

This is a brief explanation of what is meant by a formal language system, its axioms and its rules, and what we mean by a proof in a formal language system – and what we mean by saying that a formal system is consistent, complete or incomplete.


Part 3: Gödel’s numbering system

This part explains how Gödel was able to use numbers to capture all the information of any expression of formal language system. This was essential for his proof.


Part 4: Creating a special number relationship

This part explains how Gödel came up with the idea of creating a special number relationship that would correspond to the concept that one expression in a formal language system can be a proof of another expression in that formal language system


Part 5: Number relationships and the concept of substitution

This part explains how Gödel came up with the idea of creating a number relationship that would correspond to the concept of the substitution of a variable in a formal language expression.


Part 6: Matching number relationships and formal sentences

In this part Gödel shows how number relationships can have corresponding formal sentences.


Part 7: Another Numbering System

Here we explain how Gödel defined another numbering system that is similar but not quite the same as his special numbering system as seen in Part 3


Part 8: The Crux of the Proof

Here we show how Gödel creates his special ‘true but unprovable’ sentence, using the previous steps in the proof.


Part 9: The Flaw In The Proof

This part shows how Gödel confuses different languages:

  • the formal languages that he is talking about, and
  • the language that talks about those languages.


Part 10: A Demonstration of a Contradiction Arising from Gödel’s Proof

Once you see that Gödel’s can only get the result that he does by confusing languages, there are several ways you can show that the proof is logically absurd. This section demonstrates just one such logical contradiction.





Interested in supporting this site?

You can help by sharing the site with others. You can also donate at Go Get Funding: Logic and Language where there are full details.



As site owner I reserve the right to keep my comments sections as I deem appropriate. I do not use that right to unfairly censor valid criticism. My reasons for deleting or editing comments do not include deleting a comment because it disagrees with what is on my website. Reasons for exclusion include:
Frivolous, irrelevant comments.
Comments devoid of logical basis.
Derogatory comments.
Long-winded comments.
Comments with excessive number of different points.
Questions about matters that do not relate to the page they post on. Such posts are not comments.
Comments with a substantial amount of mathematical terms not properly formatted will not be published unless a file (such as doc, tex, pdf) is simultaneously emailed to me, and where the mathematical terms are correctly formatted.

Reasons for deleting comments of certain users:
Bulk posting of comments in a short space of time, often on several different pages, and which are not simply part of an ongoing discussion. Multiple anonymous user names for one person.
Users, who, when shown their point is wrong, immediately claim that they just wrote it incorrectly and rewrite it again - still erroneously, or else attack something else on my site - erroneously. After the first few instances, further posts are deleted.
Users who make persistent erroneous attacks in a scatter-gun attempt to try to find some error in what I write on this site. After the first few instances, further posts are deleted.

Difficulties in understanding the site content are usually best addressed by contacting me by e-mail.


Based on HashOver Comment System by Jacob Barkdull

Copyright   James R Meyer   2012 - 2024