Logic and Language
Load the menuLoad the menu


Copyright   James R Meyer    2012 - 2024 https://www.jamesrmeyer.com

BANNER CONTENT

Surjections and Cardinal Numbers

Page last updated 13 May 2023

 

A surjection from a set A onto a set B means that for every element in B there is an element in A that is mapped to that element in B. Note that there can be more than one element in A that maps to an element of B. If there is a one-to-one correspondence (a bijection) between two sets A and B, then there is also a surjection A onto B, and a surjection B onto A.

 

This means that if there is no surjection either way between two sets, then ipso facto, there cannot be any one-to-one correspondence between them. For finite sets, the absence of any surjection from A onto B coincides with the fact that A has fewer elements than B, and this applies for all finite sets regardless of the properties of the elements - in other words the absence of any surjection is unaffected by the properties of the elements of the sets.

 

But for infinite sets this is not the case. It is explained in One-to-one Correspondences and Properties that the absence of a one-to-one correspondence between two infinite sets implies that this is due to certain properties of the elements of the sets rather than a difference in any property of the sets that is independent of the specific characteristics of the elements of the sets.

 

The same applies to surjections between infinite sets - it is impossible to make a “list” of infinitely many matching elements, hence a definition is required and which refers to the properties of the elements of the sets, rather than any property of the sets that is independent of the precise nature of the elements. Hence, as for a bijection, the absence of a surjection between two infinite sets implies that this is due to certain properties of the elements of the sets rather than any difference in some property of the sets that is independent of the properties of their elements.

 

On the page Cardinal Numbers I refer to a fundamental assumption regarding Cardinal Numbers in transfinite set theory, see The fundamental axiom of Cardinal Numbers. One could also say that there is another assumption/axiom of Cardinal Numbers in transfinite set theory, which is:

If there is no surjection from set A onto set B, then:

the Cardinal Number of A < the Cardinal Number of B.

The usage of the symbol “ < ” with regard to natural numbers and real numbers is that if a < b (a real, b real or infinite) implies that there exists an xx real or infinity, where a + x = b, and that given a set A which has the number of elements a, a set B which has the number of elements b, and a set X which has the number of elements x, then the union of sets A and X, if they have no elements in common, has the number of elements b.

 

Extending that same usage to Cardinal Numbers as defined by transfinite set theory would imply that where a < b (ab Cardinal Numbers), there exists an xx a Cardinal Number, where a + x = b, and that given a set A which has the number of elements a, a set B which has the number of elements b, and a set X which has the number of elements x, then the union of sets A and X, if they have no elements in common, has the number of elements b.

 

So, for example, if A is the set of all natural numbers, and B is the set of all real numbers, and X is the set of all real numbers except natural numbers, then the union of A and X, since they have no elements in common, has the same number of elements as B (since the union of A and X is B) - in other words this implies that the set A, which has no limit to the number of its elements, has fewer elements than the set B, which also has no limit to the number of its elements. In terms of transfinite notation, we have that given that:

there exists a one-to-one correspondence A ∪ X to B

then, in terms of the corresponding Cardinal Numbers we have:

0 + ℵX = ℵB

This implies the contradiction that one set that has limitlessly many elements can have fewer elements than another set that also has limitlessly many elements. Some people, including some commenters to this site, such as on the page Cardinal Numbers don’t like this conclusion and attempt in various ways to evade this conclusion. But in fact, as I explain in One-to-one Correspondences and Properties the real reason why there is no surjection from A onto B, but there is a surjection from A ∪ X onto B depends completely on the properties of elements of the sets in question, rather than anything to do with the quantities of elements in the sets.

Interested in supporting this site?

You can help by sharing the site with others. You can also donate at Go Get Funding: Logic and Language where there are full details.

 

 

As site owner I reserve the right to keep my comments sections as I deem appropriate. I do not use that right to unfairly censor valid criticism. My reasons for deleting or editing comments do not include deleting a comment because it disagrees with what is on my website. Reasons for exclusion include:
Frivolous, irrelevant comments.
Comments devoid of logical basis.
Derogatory comments.
Long-winded comments.
Comments with excessive number of different points.
Questions about matters that do not relate to the page they post on. Such posts are not comments.
Comments with a substantial amount of mathematical terms not properly formatted will not be published unless a file (such as doc, tex, pdf) is simultaneously emailed to me, and where the mathematical terms are correctly formatted.


Reasons for deleting comments of certain users:
Bulk posting of comments in a short space of time, often on several different pages, and which are not simply part of an ongoing discussion. Multiple anonymous user names for one person.
Users, who, when shown their point is wrong, immediately claim that they just wrote it incorrectly and rewrite it again - still erroneously, or else attack something else on my site - erroneously. After the first few instances, further posts are deleted.
Users who make persistent erroneous attacks in a scatter-gun attempt to try to find some error in what I write on this site. After the first few instances, further posts are deleted.


Difficulties in understanding the site content are usually best addressed by contacting me by e-mail.

 

Based on HashOver Comment System by Jacob Barkdull

Copyright   James R Meyer   2012 - 2024
https://www.jamesrmeyer.com