A Simplified Explanation of Gödel's proof - Introduction


 

Next >>     [Intro]  [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10

 


 

 

Introduction

This simplified explanation of Gödel's proof has been written in an attempt to make the proof as accessible as possible to as many people as possible, using straightforward English language with a few simple symbols. I have deliberately avoided any need for knowledge on the part of the reader of any complex mathematics. Please note that this simplified explanation is not intended to be a substitute for my detailed explanation of the flaw in Gödel's proof, which can be found at The Flaw in Gödel's proof

 

The simplified explanation is broken down into ten parts:

 

 

Part 1: Basic Logical Concepts

This is a brief survey of variables, what is meant by free and bound variables, and the concept of the substitution of a variable, and the concepts of propositions and functions.

 

Part 2: Formal Language Systems

This is a brief explanation of what is meant by a formal language system, its axioms and its rules, and what we mean by a proof in a formal language system – and what we mean by saying that a formal system is consistent, complete or incomplete.

 

Part 3: Gödel's numbering system

This part explains how Gödel was able to use numbers to capture all the information of any expression of formal language system. This was essential for his proof.

 

Part 4: Creating a special number relationship

This part explains how Gödel came up with the idea of creating a special number relationship that would correspond to the concept that one expression in a formal language system can be a proof of another expression in that formal language system

 

Part 5: Number relationships and the concept of substitution

This part explains how Gödel came up with the idea of creating number relationship that would correspond to the concept of the substitution of a variable in a formal language expression.

 

Part 6: Matching number relationships and formal sentences

In this part Gödel shows how number relationships can have corresponding formal sentences.

 

Part 7: Another Numbering System

Here we explain how Gödel defined another numbering system that is similar but not quite the same as his special numbering system as seen in Part 3

 

Part 8: The Crux of the Proof

Here we show how Gödel creates his special 'true but unprovable' sentence, using the previous steps in the proof.

 

Part 9: The Flaw In The Proof

This part shows how Gödel confuses the languages that he is talking about and the language that is talking about these languages.

 

Part 10: A Demonstration of a Contradiction Arising from Gödel's Proof

Once you see that Gödel's can only get the result that he does by confusing languages, there are several ways you can show that the proof is logically absurd. This part shows just one such logical contradiction.

 


 

Next >>     [Intro] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

 


 

New section! - Please leave a comment ...

Diverse opinions and criticisms are welcome, but frivolous and irrelevant messages will be blocked, so please note that all comments will be checked before appearing on this site. Note: you will be asked to provide an e-mail address - this will only be used to notify you of replies to your comments - it will never be used for any other purpose, will never be displayed and does not require verification.

 

NB: Comments are common to the entire website, so please indicate what section of the site you are commenting on.

 


 
comments powered by Disqus
Google Logo

Search this site

Search the web

 


 

NEW


 

For convenience, there are now two pages on this site with links to various material relating to Gödel and the Incompleteness Theorem – a page with general links –

Gödel Links

 

– and a link relating specifically to the Gödel mind-machine debate –

Gödel, Minds, and Machines

 


 

Comments  

Comments on this site are welcome, please see comment section at the bottom of this page.

 

Please note that this web site, like any other is a collection of various statements. Not all of this web site is intended to be factual. Some of it is personal opinion or interpretation.

 

If you prefer to ask me directly about the material on this site, please send me an e-mail with your query (click here for the e-mail address) and I will attempt to reply promptly.

 

Feedback about site design would also be appreciated so that I can improve the site.