This page is keyboard accessible:
• Use Tab, Shift + Tab keys to traverse the main menu. To enter a sub-menu use the Right Arrow key. To leave a sub-menu use the Left Arrow or the Escape key.
• The Enter or the Space key opens the active menu item.
• To skip the menu and move to the main content, press Tab after the page loads to reveal a skip button.
• To get back to the top of the page anytime, press the Home key.
• For more information, click here: Accessibility   Close this tip.

Note: Full functionality of this web page requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser.
 

Citroen C4 – Brake pad replacement

This applies to my Citroen 2012 C4 1.6 HDi with automatic handbrake. So far I have only had to replace the pads on the front brakes. For service info see Citroen C4 Service.

 

Automatic handbrake

Normally the handbrake is applied automatically when you turn off the engine. To keep the handbrake off when the engine is turned off, follow this procedure:

  • Turn the ignition on.
  • Hold the foot brake pedal down.
  • Apply the handbrake switch
  • The handbrake will release and there will be a bleeping sound.
  • Turn ignition off
  • The handbrake will remain off until you start the engine again.

 

Front brakes

As far as I am aware there are two makes of brake that might be on this model, Lucas or Bosch. The one described here is Bosch.

  1. The brake caliper (which is floating, which means it is free to move a small amount side to side), is held by two screws with T50 Torx heads.

     

  2. The lower one has an attachment that should be removed first, there is a plastic cap which should be prized open, then use a Torx30 to unscrew it.

     

     

  3. To unscrew the caliper screws, you need to hold the part that it screws into, see picture.

     

  4. Unscrew the caliper - use good quality Torx T50 bits for this. When you have the caliper unscrewed, prop it up on something so it is not hanging by the brake lines. Remove the old pads and the metal clips.

     

  5. Remove the brake reservoir cap in the engine bay.

     

  6. Next you have to push in the pistons. These pistons have to be wound as they are pushed in, so you should get the proper tool for this. You can get cheap ones on eBay or similar, I got an excellent one with attachments for various different brakes for £16. If you attempt pushing in the piston without a special tool I can only wish you the best of luck as you will certainly need it!

     

  7. When pushing in the piston check every so often that the brake fluid is not overflowing out of the reservoir. The piston on the right-side brake must be wound clockwise. The piston must on the left-side brake must be wound anticlockwise. They should be nearly impossible to turn in the opposite direction.

     

  8. Next give the caliper a good cleaning and remove any build up of dirt and deposits, especially where the pads are located. You may find that a file is useful for this. You want the new pads to be able to move relatively freely, otherwise your brakes may bind - i.e., the pads keep rubbing against the disc and this causes wear and overheating. Also clean the piston gently with a cloth and solvent.

     

  9. I found that it was easier to reassemble the caliper assembly by taking the fixed part of the caliper off, this is also held by two Torx T50 screws.

     

  10. When you have it all reassembled, pump the brakes a few times to push the pistons onto the pads so as to take up any slack. Then spin the wheels and check that the brakes are not sticking - if they are, something is not right and you will have to investigate.

     

  11. Replace the brake reservoir cap.

     

  12. Use somewhere safe to check the brakes are working okay before you go out on a journey.

Diverse opinions and criticisms are welcome, but messages that are frivolous, irrelevant or devoid of logical basis will be blocked (comments will be checked before appearing on this site). Difficulties in understanding the site content are usually best addressed by contacting me by e-mail.Note: you will be asked to provide an e-mail address - this will only be used to notify you of replies to your comments - it will never be used for any other purpose, will never be displayed and does not require verification. Comments are common to the entire website, so please indicate what section of the site you are commenting on.

 

If you cannot see any comments below, it may be that a plug-in on your browser is blocking Disqus comments from loading. Avast anti-virus in particular is known to do this, especially with Internet Explorer and Safari. See Disqus Browser plug-in/extension conflicts or Why isn’t the comment box loading?.

 

 

Please wait for comments to load …  

 

The Lighter Side

 

NEWS

Peter Smith’s ‘Proof’

It has come to my notice that, when asked about the demonstration of the flaw in his proof (see A Fundamental Flaw in an Incompleteness Proof by Peter Smith PDF), Smith refuses to engage in any logical discussion, and instead attempts to deflect attention away from any such discussion. If any other reader has tried to engage with Smith regarding my demonstration of the flaw, I would be interested to know what the outcome was.

 

 

There’s something about Gödel by Francesco Berto

There is a new addition to the page Yet another flawed incompleteness proof, where Berto’s proof of incompleteness in his book There’s something about Gödel comes under scrutiny.

 

 

Easy Footnotes

I found that making, adding or deleting footnotes in the traditional manner proved to be a major pain. So I developed a different system for footnotes which makes inserting or changing footnotes a doddle. You can check it out at Easy Footnotes for Web Pages (Accessibility friendly).

 

 

O’Connor’s “computer checked” proof

I have now added a new section to my paper on Russell O’Connor’s claim of a computer verified incompleteness proof. This shows that the flaw in the proof arises from a reliance on definitions that include unacceptable assumptions - assumptions that are not actually checked by the computer code. See also the new page Representability.

 

 

New page on Chaitin’s Constant

There is now a new page on Chaitin’s Constant (Chaitin’s Omega), which demonstrates that Chaitin has failed to prove that it is actually algorithmically irreducible.

 

Previous Blog Posts  

 

16th Mar 2015 Bishops Dancing with Pixies?

 

23rd Feb 2015 Artificial Intelligence

 

31 Mar 2015 Cranks and Crackpots

 

30 Apr 2015 The Chinese Room

 

Links  

 

For convenience, there are now two pages on this site with links to various material relating to Gödel and the Incompleteness Theorem

 

– a page with general links:

Gödel Links

 

– and a page relating specifically to the Gödel mind-machine debate:

Gödel, Minds, and Machines

 

Printer Friendly

 

All pages on this website are printer friendly, and will print the main content in a convenient format. Note that the margins are set by your browser print settings.


Note: for some browsers JavaScript must be enabled for this to operate correctly.

 

Comments

 

Comments on this site are welcome, please see the comment section.

 

Please note that this web site, like any other is a collection of various statements. Not all of this web site is intended to be factual. Some of it is personal opinion or interpretation.

 

If you prefer to ask me directly about the material on this site, please send me an e-mail with your query, and I will attempt to reply promptly.

 

Feedback about site design would also be appreciated so that I can improve the site.

 


Copyright © James R Meyer 2012 - 2017  
www.jamesrmeyer.com