Logic and Language

Logic and Language

Copyright © James R Meyer 2012 - 2018 www.jamesrmeyer.com

This page is keyboard accessible:

• Use**Tab**, **Shift + Tab **keys to traverse the main menu. To enter a sub-menu use the **Right Arrow** key. To leave a sub-menu use the **Left Arrow** or the **Escape** key.

• The**Enter** or the **Space** key opens the active menu item.

• To skip the menu and move to the main content, press**Tab** after the page loads to reveal a skip button.

• To get back to the top of the page anytime, press the**Home** key.

• For more information, click here: Accessibility Close this tip.

• Use

• The

• To skip the menu and move to the main content, press

• To get back to the top of the page anytime, press the

• For more information, click here: Accessibility Close this tip.

Note: Full functionality of this web page requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser.

7: Relations of Natural Numbers 24 to 46

Note that (provided you have JavaScript enabled) clicking on (show) will reveal further details, while clicking again will hide it. Also, clicking on (show Gödel’s) will reveal relevant parts of Gödel’s text (shown in green), while clicking again will hide it. Please note that older browsers may not display some symbols correctly.

This guide is intended to assist in attaining a full understanding of Gödel’s proof. If there is any difficulty in following any part of the proof, please contact me and I will try to help. And if you have any suggestions as to how this guide might be improved, please contact me. This guide is intended to be read alongside the English translation of Gödel’s original proof which can be viewed online at English translation of Gödel’s original proof or as a PDF file at English translation of Gödel’s original proof, PDF file.

The number-theoretic relations are now becoming more complex as they correspond to more complex statements about formulas of the formal system **P**. It is not intended to cover every detail of these relations, but rather to concentrate on the main points and the thrust of the argument. It would be easy to get bogged down in such details and then fail to see the wood for the trees. As noted on the previous page, the names of the relations are mainly abbreviations of German words, see notes at the foot of this page for the words and the English translations.

These define number-theoretic relations that correspond to assertions as to whether a symbol is a free variable or a bound variable within a given symbol string.

24. **v Geb n,x** (show)

25. **v Fr n,x** (show)

26. **v Fr x** (show)

The functions 27-30 lead up the function 31 which corresponds to the concept of the substitution of a free variable by a symbol or symbol string of the formal system.

27. **Su x(n|y) **28. **k St v,x** 29. **A(v,x)** 30. **Sb _{k}(x v|y)** 31.

Note that, depending on what version of the translation you are using, **Sb** may be represented in this format:

which is the format used in Gödel’s original paper.

Assertions as to which numbers correspond to the axioms of the formal system

Functions 32 and 33 define some axioms of the formal system. Relations 34-42 inclusive are relations that use the previously defined relations/functions to define which Gödel numbers correspond to the axioms of the formal system.

32. **x Imp y, x Con y, x Aeq y, v Ex y**
(show)

33. **n Th x**
(show)

34. **Z–Ax(x)** (show)

35. **A _{1}-Ax(x)**,

37. **Q(z,y,v)** (show)

38. **L _{1}-Ax(x)** (show)

39. **L _{2}-Ax(x)** (show)

40. **R-Ax(x)** (show)

41. **M-Ax(x)** (show)

42. **Ax(x)** (show)

Proofs in the formal system

The relations 43-46 deal with defining the number-theoretic relations that correspond to the concepts of the rules of inference of the system, the concept of a proof-schema, and the concept of a formula being provable in the system.

43. **Fl(x y z)** (show)

44. **Bw(x)** (show)

45. **x B y** (show)

46. **Bew(x)** (show)

Below is a list of names used for various relations in the text, which are mostly abbreviations of German words; translations are provided below:

A | Anzahl | = number |

Aeq | Aequivalenz | = equivalence |

Ax | Axiom | = axiom |

B | Beweis | = proof |

Bew | Beweisbar | = provable |

Bw | Beweisfigur | = proof-schema |

Con | Conjunktion | = conjunction |

Dis | Disjunktion | = disjunction |

E | Einklammern | = include in brackets |

Elf | Elementarformel | = elementary formula |

Ex | Existenz | = existence |

Fl | unmittelbare Folge | = immediate consequence |

Flg | Folgerungsmenge | = set of consequences |

Form | Formel | = formula |

Fr | frei | = free |

FR | Reihe von Formeln | = series of formulae |

Geb | gebunden | = bound |

Gen | Generalisation | = generalization |

Gl | Glied | = term |

Imp | Implikation | = implication |

l | Lange | = length |

Neg | Negation | = negation |

Op | Operation | = operation |

Pr | Primzahl | = prime number |

Prim | Primzahl | = prime number |

R | Zahlenreihe | = number series |

Sb | Substitution | = substitution |

St | Stelle | = place |

Su | Substitution | = substitution |

Th | Typenerhohung | = type-lift |

Typ | Typ | = type |

Var | Variable | = variable |

Wid | Widerspruchsfreiheit | = consistency |

Z | Zahlzeichen | = number-symbol |

Diverse opinions and criticisms are welcome, but messages that are frivolous, irrelevant or devoid of logical basis will be blocked. Difficulties in understanding the site content are usually best addressed by contacting me by e-mail. Note: you will be asked to provide an e-mail address - any address will do, it does not require verification. Your e-mail will only be used to notify you of replies to your comments - it will never be used for any other purpose and will not be displayed. If you cannot see any comments below, see Why isn’t the comment box loading?.

How you can tell if someone is a crackpot

A review of Buldt’s *The Scope of Gödel’s First Incompleteness Theorem*

There is now a new page on a contradiction in Lebesgue measure theory.

There is now a new page Halbach and Zhang’s *Yablo without Gödel* which analyzes the illogical assumptions used by Halbach and Zhang.

I found that making, adding or deleting footnotes in the traditional manner proved to be a major pain. So I developed a different system for footnotes which makes inserting or changing footnotes a doddle. You can check it out at Easy Footnotes for Web Pages (Accessibility friendly).

I have now added a new section to my paper on Russell O’Connor’s claim of a computer verified incompleteness proof. This shows that the flaw in the proof arises from a reliance on definitions that include unacceptable assumptions - assumptions that are not actually checked by the computer code. See also the new page Representability.

13 Jan 2017 Ned Block’s Blockhead

8 Apr 2016 Are we alone in the Universe?

13 May 2015 Good Math, Bad Math?

31 Mar 2015 Cranks and Crackpots

16th Mar 2015 Bishops Dancing with Pixies?

For convenience, there are now two pages on this site with links to various material relating to Gödel and the Incompleteness Theorem

– a page with general links:

– and a page relating specifically to the Gödel mind-machine debate:

All pages on this website are printer friendly, and will print the main content in a convenient format. Note that the margins are set by your browser print settings.

Note: for some browsers JavaScript must be enabled for this to operate correctly.

Comments on this site are welcome, please see the comment section.

Please note that this web site, like any other is a collection of various statements. Not all of this web site is intended to be factual. Some of it is personal opinion or interpretation.

If you prefer to ask me directly about the material on this site, please send me an e-mail with your query, and I will attempt to reply promptly.

Feedback about site design would also be appreciated so that I can improve the site.

Copyright © James R Meyer 2012 - 2018

www.jamesrmeyer.com